(Yates J), docket Judge of the (Federal Court proceedings), committed perjury while trying to cover up issues raised by (Christian) about injustice and bias, in (Yates J) having provided a 42-day stoppage to facilitate the Nestlé and (Post) cover up and in (Yates J) having co-authored a book with Nestlé IP lawyers (BHF) partner Kate Haddock, with (Yates J) and (Christian) statements from the hearing transcript:
YATES J: “I can stop you there, Mr Christian. I haven’t written a book with Ms Haddock. I don’t know what you’re talking about.”
MR CHRISTIAN: “Okay.”
YATES J: “So you are mistaken.”
MR CHRISTIAN: “Well, I don’t know how to – I don’t know what else to say apart from, I’ve got a title here that has your name on it, David Markey Yates and Kate Haddock.”
YATES J: “I have absolutely no idea what that’s about. Would you like to tell me what the title is?”
MR CHRISTIAN: “Yes. The title is Trademarks & Passing Off. It was written – the publication was written in 1993.”
YATES J: “Who published it?”
MR CHRISTIAN: “It doesn’t say who the publisher is, but the book is at the State Library of Victoria and that your name, your Honour, and Kate Haddock are authors on the book.”
YATES J: “Well, it’s not me. I have written no book and I have written no book with Ms Haddock. There’s another D.M. Yates who practices in the area of intellectual property. I don’t know whether he is the person who is the author of that book with Ms Haddock. It’s not me.”
But on 3 November 2014 in response to an email from (Christian), David Yates, a partner at Corrs Chambers Westgarth lawyers, the other Yates referred to by (Yates J), stated by email:
“No I am not the author of the book. And that will be the Judge.”
And on 5 November 2014 an email was sent to the chambers of (Yates J), from Nestlé and (Post) lawyers Banki Haddock Fiora stating:
“Mr Christian’s reference appears to be correct. Although Ms Haddock has no recollection of the event.”
(Yates J) conspired to ensure a further stoppage in proceedings by causing a reserved judgment for 8-months and 2-days.
JUSTICE YATES CONSPIRED
Federal Court appeal judgments are delivered within 3-months and in the Federal Court of Australia Annual Report for 2015/16 it states:
The Court has a goal of delivering reserved judgments within a period of three months.
During the (Yates J) 8-month and 2-day stoppage (Post) dumped the Musashi brand in an on-sell at a $40 million loss and the new owners Vitaco Holdings Limited completed a $332 million initial public offering (IPO) on the Australian Securities Exchange (ASX) promoting the Musashi brand while concealing the (Federal Court Proceedings) that exposed (Post) violations of U.S. antitrust laws.
A-SASHI STORY 